ADVERTISEMENT
The following morning, the digital tether that had brought them together delivered the final verdict. Daniel sent a message that was a masterpiece of kind but firm boundary-setting. He thanked her for her company and praised their conversation, but he concluded by stating that he didn’t believe their fundamental outlooks were a match. He wished her the best and closed the door.
Initially, Maya felt a sting of rejection, a reflexive anger at being “dismissed” over something as trivial as a dinner check. But as the day wore on, the anger gave way to a burgeoning, uncomfortable clarity. She began to dissect the evening not through the lens of her own expectations, but through the objective reality of the encounter. She realized that she had treated Daniel not as a potential partner, but as a host whose primary function was to facilitate her comfort. She had ordered without restraint and expected him to absorb the cost of her anxiety without question.
Maya didn’t delete her dating apps in a fit of pique. Instead, she updated her approach. The next time she matched with someone, she ensured that the venue was a mutual choice. When the bill arrived, she was the first one to reach for it. She learned that there is a profound power in being the person who offers, rather than the person who expects. Sometimes, the most expensive dinner is the one that costs you a connection you didn’t realize was worth saving. By losing Daniel, Maya gained a perspective that ensured she would never again let a piece of paper determine the value of a human being.