Mexican president states that Trump is not! See more in comment – Story Of The Day!

The rift between global superpowers deepened as the hours passed. China issued a blistering condemnation of the U.S. military action on Sunday morning. The Chinese Foreign Ministry stated that the strikes seriously worsened tensions in an already volatile Middle East and urged an immediate cessation of hostilities. Beijing’s stance was clear: the move bypassed the authority of the UN Charter and undermined the work of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). China’s call for a return to dialogue and negotiations, specifically targeting Israel to cease further provocations, highlighted the growing divide between Western interventions and the diplomatic preferences of the East.

At the United Nations, Secretary-General António Guterres appeared visibly shaken by the escalation. In a statement reported by Reuters, Guterres warned that the strikes posed a “catastrophic” risk to global peace and security. He pleaded with the involved parties to avoid a “spiral of chaos,” emphasizing that there is no military solution to the nuclear standoff. His words reflected the anxiety of a global body that sees the traditional mechanisms of de-escalation being bypassed in favor of kinetic action.

Across Europe, the tone was one of frantic caution. The European Union’s chief diplomat, Kaja Kallas, urged all sides to “step back” from the precipice, though she maintained the EU’s firm stance that Iran must never be permitted to develop a nuclear weapon. While EU foreign ministers prepared to convene on Monday, U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer echoed the call for stability, urging Tehran to return to the negotiating table. This drew a sharp retort from Araghchi, who questioned how Iran could return to a table it “never left,” and accused the West of being the party that effectively blew up the diplomatic process.

The reaction within the Middle East revealed a region on edge. Saudi Arabia, which had only recently mended a seven-year diplomatic rift with Iran in March 2023, expressed “great concern” over the developments in its “sisterly” neighbor. The precariousness of this regional rapprochement is now under extreme duress. Meanwhile, non-state actors and Iranian-backed groups were more direct in their condemnation. Yemen’s Houthi militants denounced the “blatant aggression,” while the Lebanese presidency expressed deep-seated fears that the bombing of nuclear facilities would destabilize multiple countries across the Levant and beyond.

The ripples of the strike reached as far as Moscow and Tokyo. Dmitry Medvedev, the former Russian president and current senior security official, took to Telegram to mock the idea of Trump receiving a Nobel Peace Prize, noting that a leader who arrived with a “peacemaker” mandate had instead initiated a “new war.” In Japan, Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba adopted a more measured tone, acknowledging the need to block Iran’s nuclear development while stopping short of a full endorsement of the U.S. strikes. Ishiba’s focus remained on the “paramount” need to calm the situation before the global economy felt the full weight of a Middle Eastern crisis.